By Adv. Vinod Sampat CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2544 OF 2010 Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd. ………….. Appellant Versus Panchali Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ………….. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2545 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2546 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2547 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2548 OF... (Continue reading)
In a recent case of an argument of a real estate development company that they are entitled to sell garages or stilt parking areas as separate flats to owners who intend to use it as parking facilities, a bench of... (Continue reading)
In a recent case of a writ petition filed against a case of flat owners of an illegally constructed building seeking respite from the BMC’s orders, the divison Bench of the Bombay HC held that in such matters it is... (Continue reading)
Kishori Sharad Gaitonde vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee, a tenant in a flat, sold tenancy rights for Rs. 30 lakhs and offered long-term capital gains on the basis that the said sum was the consideration. The AO took the view... (Continue reading)
The Madras High Court has held that an instrument, whether a certificate of sale or sale deed, issued in a public auction of properties, was chargeable with stamp duty under Article 18 read with Article 23 of Schedule I to... (Continue reading)
Importance of Occupation Certificate (OC)... (Continue reading)
Recently, the Mumbai bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of United Motors (I) Ltd. has held that income from transfer of a leased premises without transferring its own business amounts to extinguishment of the taxpayer's right... (Continue reading)
A five-judge bench of the Bombay High Court upheld a 1980 ruling by a three-judge bench on holding of land in Maharashtra under the Agriculture Land Ceiling Act. The ruling means that while deciding whether a person is holding land... (Continue reading)
A minority of tenants cannot stand in the way of redevelopment of a property if 70% of the tenants have given their approval for it, the Bombay high court has ruled. ... (Continue reading)
The Supreme Court (SC) has held that the government can’t use its "extraordinary" powers to deprive an owner of his land as it would violate the citizen’s Fundamental Right.... (Continue reading)