Comments on: Rent Control Act.

By: TARUNKUMAR PRAJAPATI

TARUNKUMAR PRAJAPATI — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:36:27 +0000

me ahmedabad me 1975 se kiraya pe rehta tha, lekin year 2001 me makan malik ne muzse kiraya nahi leya aur 24/9/2001 me trail court me case kiya, aur 2003 me trail court me case mere favour me aya, ab 2004 me use small cause tribunal me apple ki case ka judgement 15 sept 2011 me makan malik ke favour me gaya, use ke bad mene gujarat high court me rivision pition dakhal ki leking high court ne meri pitition ko reject kiya aur mere ko 6 month ke bat makan khali karne ka order diya, yeh order undertaking ke sath he,ab muze the bombay rent contral ect ke adhin suprime court me ja sakta hu ki nahi, mera case he rent ariare ka jo me nahi tha please inform muze ab kya karna chahiye

By: Harshad

Harshad — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:16:46 +0000

Since 1946 we are residing as licenses in a building owned by a Charitable Trust. Leave & License agreement had been entered into in 1946 and thereafter, no Leave & License Agreements have been made or renewed. Please note that no concession in rent is given to us and our rent is fixed by trust after calculation of all expenses on no profit no loss basis and as per market rates. Now, the Trust is forcing us to enter into fresh Leave & License Agreement failing which evacuation proceedings shall be initiated against us. We are told that we do not have protection of Sec. 15 A (1) of Bombay Rent Act and they are exempted under Section 3 (2) (ii) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 which states that provision of this act shall not apply to premises held by public trust for a religious or charitable purpose and let at a nominal or concessional rent. Please advise me our legal status and let me know whether we are deemed or statutory tenants or not.

By: vic

vic — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:34:52 +0000

what is the reason behind house owners in bangalore demanding above 30000 to 120000 indian rupees as security deposit while renting even a small room or a PG? is it the law of the state? if so then where to confirm?

By: Sandeep

Sandeep — Tue, 31 May 2011 19:51:41 +0000

Hi iam staying in a rented property from 36 years our landlord received his property in refugee rehabilitation. he acquired the plots adjacent illegaly and rented them he sold most of the plots to his tenants which are actual collector plots.now he wants us to vacate our home though i have electricity bill on my name. what legal procedure can be done

By: Rajaram

Rajaram — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:29:33 +0000

I AM STAYING WITH MY AUNT FOR NEARLY 26 YEARS AS TENENT WHAT IS MY LEGAL RIGHT.

By: D.V.S

D.V.S — Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:41:40 +0000

A TENANT LIVES IN RENTED RESIDENCE FLAT FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS IN MUMBAI, BUT
COULD NOT PAY RENT TO LANDLORD FOR LAST ABOUT 2 YEARS DUE TO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS. HOWEVER HE PAID ARRERS OF RENT BEFORE 2 DAYS OF JUDGEMENT IN SMALL
CAUSE COURT. SUBSEQUENTLY THE JUDGEMENT WAS DELIVERED AGAINST HIM TO EVICUATE THE FLAT. HE IS A SENIOR CITIZEN OF 73 YEARS OLD AND HAS NO OTHER PREMISES TO STAY WHILE LANDLORD IS NOT IN GENUINE NEED OF PREMISES.PLEASE GUIDE HOW FAR HE WILL SUCCESS IF APPEAL IS FILED.

By: D.V.S

D.V.S — Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:37:56 +0000

A TENANT LIVES IN RENTED RESIDENCE FLAT FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS IN MUMBAI, BUT
COULD NOT PAY RENT TO LANDLORD FOR LAST ABOUT 2 YEARS DUE TO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS. HOWEVER HE PAID ARRERS OF RENT BEFORE 2 DAYS OF JUDGEMENT IN SMALL
CAUSE COURT WHICH WAS AGAINST HIM TO EVICUATE THE FLAT. HE IS SENIOR CITIZEN AND HAS NO OTHER PREMISES TO STAY WHILE LANLORD IS NOT IN GENUINE NEED OF PREMISES.PLEASE GUIDE HOW FAR HE WILL SUCCESS IF APPEAL IS FILED.

By: VIKRAM

VIKRAM — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:22:18 +0000

Your article is extremly well documented. Literally gives the saga of many a honest landlord getting duped of his own property while the tenant companies enjoying the protection of the law….ok my question is what if the tenant company had a paid up capital of more that 1 cr before the 1999 ammendment & onece the law got ammended , rather after the ammendment of the law, reduced their paid up capital lesser than 1 cr so that they could continue to enjoy protection…now isnt that unlawful on the part of the corporate tenant & done with malafied intentions????? in such a case what route should be applied by the landlord?

By: AMIT DAVE

AMIT DAVE — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:42:18 +0000

i want to know the rights of tenants and security for them under maharashtra rent control act.

By: Michael Rodrigues

Michael Rodrigues — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:59:27 +0000

Can a tenant whohas a rented house in Mumbaifor more than 50 years be taken away by the land lord if he is not staying there for more than 10 years Can a tenant of a rented house sell this house to a third party