Residential Rental VS. Ownership
RESIDENTIAL RENTAL VS. OWNERSHIP – A MUMBAI PERSPECTIVE
Abhishek Kiran Gupta, Head – Research, Jones Lang LaSalle Meghraj
Rental – Mumbai is a city with population of 20 million plus, and a major proportion of this population is constituted by a migrant workforce. Many of these will eventually return to their respective home states and cities. Moreover, a large segment of this migrant population cannot afford the property rates. Mumbai is expanding linearly towards the North. Since all major business activities are towards the South part of the city, where residential prices are generally unaffordable. These segments do not choose to settle down and buy property in the city, and this creates a huge demand-base for rental properties, since rentals in these parts of Mumbai are still affordable from the mid-management level onwards.
Nevertheless, rental affordability is still an issue for end users in the more centralized areas of Mumbai. By the same coin, the income on rental returns for property owners ranges from a mere 2.5%-3.5% annually, capital appreciation notwithstanding.
Outright ownership – Among the huge population base, there is always a component of people who seek to eventually own their own property.
With more and more of the farther suburbs getting developed, there are always opportunities for this segment to enter the residential market at a relatively affordable level. They will benefit from the inevitable price rises as these areas develop in terms of connectivity and social / general infrastructure. Therefore, there is also a perennial demand for owned residential properties among those who can afford the capital outlay necessary to avail of the investment potential of Mumbai’s high appreciation rates. Amenable home loan interest rates serve to keep this demand at a healthy level.
The problems related to ownership property in Mumbai are lack of general affordability, a high incidence of legal issues pertaining to clear titles, construction delays and lack of compliance to original development plans by builders.
On viewing all aspects of the rental Vs. ownership property issue, it emerges that the two demand typologies cannot be fairly compared one against the other, since both represent very dynamic sides of the same coin. Mumbai’s residential market banks heavily on both.
MUMBAI RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL VALUES (INR/sq.ft)
Source – Homebay Residential, Jones Lang LaSalle Meghraj
Bandra (W) 18,000-28,000
Khar 18,000-25,000
Andheri 7,500-16,000
Santacruz 8,500-14,000
Vile Parle 8,000-12,000
Mira Road 2,800-3,800
Malad 5,500-9,000
Goregaon 6,000-11,500
Borivali 6,200-7,500
Kandivali 6,300-9,000
Dahisar 3,800-5,000
Virar 2,400-2,800
Vasai 2,400-2,600
Chembur 7,000-9,000
Mulund 5,700-7,000
Thane 3,200-4,500
Lower Parel 18,000-25,000
Vashi 5,200-6,800
Nerul 4,800-6,000
Belapur 4,000-5,100
Kharghar 3,000-4,500
Panvel 1,800-3,600
Sanpada 5,100-6,300
Parel 14,000-18,000





















The Maharashtra Government needs to abolish or ammend the Maharashtra Rent Act in order to allow more apartments to come into the rental segment,and thus lower the property rates.